4.6 Article

(-)-Epicatechin regenerates the chlorinating activity of myeloperoxidase in vitro and in neutrophil granulocytes

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 130, 期 -, 页码 84-91

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2013.10.002

关键词

Aminophenyl fluorescein; Peroxidases; Compound II accumulation; Myeloperoxidase; Neutrophils; (-)-epicatechin

资金

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF 1315883]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The heme-containing enzyme myeloperoxidase (MPO) is mainly expressed in polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), the most abundant immune cell type in the blood. Accordingly, MPO is classically attributed to the innate immune response against pathogens. Yet, new results also show immune-regulatory functions of the halogenating MPO activity including the formation of anti-inflammatory mediators. In this work we tested the ability of the flavonoid (-)-epicatechin to regenerate this enzymatic activity both in vitro at the isolated MPO-H2O2-Cl- system and ex vivo in human PMNs. For all experiments the non-fluorescent dye aminophenyl fluorescein (APF) was used. Upon oxidation by the MPO, the halogenation product hypochlorous acid (HOCl) fluorescein is formed which can be detected e.g. by flow cytometry. The in vitro- and ex vivo-results concordantly show that (-)-epicatechin is a suitable substrate to overcome a compound II accumulation of MPO which was experimentally forced by applying excess hydrogen peroxide. Thereby concentration-dependent effects of the flavan-3-ol were found in both cases and confirmed the proposed mode of action of (-)-epicatechin. The results are in accordance with previous stopped-flow kinetic studies which showed a high reactivity of the polyphenol with MPO compound II. The obtained data may contribute to the explanation of the well-known health promoting effects of (-)-epicatechin. Moreover, the presented study provides new insights into the role of MPO during inflammation. (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据