4.6 Article

Spectral and thermodynamic properties of methanobactin from γ-proteobacterial methane oxidizing bacteria: A case for copper competition on a molecular level

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 104, 期 12, 页码 1240-1247

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2010.08.002

关键词

Chalkophore; Copper; Methanobactin; Membrane-associated methane monooxygenase; Methanotroph; Methylococcus capsulatus Bath; Methylomicrobium album BG8; Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b; Siderophore

资金

  1. Department of Energy [DE-FC26-05NT42431]
  2. Carl Page Foundation
  3. ORSP, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire
  4. NIH, National Biomedical ESR Center [EB00198]
  5. NSF [CHE-0521019, CHE-0619296]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Methanobactin (mb) is a low molecular mass copper-binding molecule analogous to iron-binding siderophores. The molecule is produced by many methanotrophic or methane oxidizing bacteria (MOB), but has only been characterized to date in one MOB, Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. To explore the potential molecular diversity in this novel class of metal binding compound, the spectral (UV-visible, fluorescent, and electron paramagnetic resonance) and thermodynamic properties of mb from two gamma-proteobacterial MOB. Methylococcus capsulatus Bath and Methylomicrobium album BG8, were determined and compared to the mb from the alpha-proteobacterial MOB, M. trichosporium OB3b. The mb from both gamma-proteobacterial MOB differed from the mb from M. trichosporium O83b in molecular mass and spectral properties. Compared to mb from M. trichosporium OB3b, the extracellular concentrations were low, as were copper-binding constants of mb from both gamma-proteobacterial MOB. In addition, the mb from M. trichosporium OB3b removed Cu(I) from the mb of both gamma-proteobacterial MOB. Taken together the results suggest mb may be a factor in regulating methanotrophic community structure in copper-limited environments. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据