4.6 Article

Insights into substrate binding at FeMo-cofactor in nitrogenase from the structure of an α-70Ile MoFe protein variant

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 385-389

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2009.11.009

关键词

Nitrogenase; MoFe protein; FeMo-cofactor; Proton reduction; Hydride intermediate

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-GM069938, R01-GM59087]
  2. Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences
  5. NASA Astrobiology Institute [NNA08CN85A]
  6. NASA [103836, NNA08CN85A] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The X-ray crystal structure is presented for a nitrogenase MoFe protein where the alpha subunit residue at position 70 (alpha-70(Val)) has been substituted by the amino acid isoleucine (alpha-70(Ile)). Substitution of alpha-70(Val) by alpha-70(Ile) results in a MoFe protein that is hampered in its ability to reduce a range of substrates including acetylene and N-2, yet retains normal proton reduction activity. The 2.3 angstrom structure of the alpha-70(Ile) MoFe protein is compared to the alpha-70(Val) wild-type MoFe protein, revealing that the delta methyl group of alpha-70(Val) is positioned over Fe6 within the active site FeMo-cofactor. This work provides strong crystallographic support for the previously proposed model that substrates bind and are reduced at a single 4Fe-4S face of the FeMo-cofactor and that when alpha-70(Val) is substituted by alpha-70(Ile) access of substrates to Fe6 of this face is effectively blocked. Furthermore the detailed examination of the structure provides the basis for understanding the ability to trap and characterize hydrides in the variant, contributing significantly to our understanding of substrate access and substrate reduction at the FeMo-cofactor active site of nitrogenase. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据