4.6 Article

Alendronate and Pamidronate calcium phosphate bone cements: Setting properties and in vitro response of osteoblast and osteoclast cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 101-106

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.09.012

关键词

Calcium phosphates; Bone cement; Bisphosphonates

资金

  1. MIUR
  2. Fondazione Monte dei Paschi di Siena (Progetto Traslazione Clinica Ingegneria Tissutale Muscolo-Scheletrica)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have investigated the effect of Alendronate and Pamidronate, two bisphosphonates widely employed for the treatment of pathologies related to bone loss, on the setting properties and in vitro bioactivity of a calcium phosphate bone cement. The cement composition includes a-tricalcium phosphate (alpha-TCP) (90 wt%), nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (5 wt%) and CaHPO4 center dot 2H(2)O (5 wt%). Disodium Alendronate and disodium Pamidronate were added to the liquid phase (bidistilled water) at two different concentrations: 0.4 and 1 mM (AL0.4, AL1.0, PAM0.4, PAM1.0). Both the initial and the final setting times of the bisphosphonate-containing cements increase with respect to the control cement. X-ray diffraction analysis, mechanical tests, and SEM investigations were carried out on the cements after different times of soaking in physiological solution. The rate of transformation of a-TCP into calcium deficient hydroxyapatite, as well as the microstructure of the cements, is not affected by the presence of Alendronate and Pamidronate. At variance, the bisphosphonates provoke a modest worsening of the mechanical properties. MG63 osteoblasts grown on the cements show a normal morphology and biological tests demonstrate very rate of proliferation and viability in every experimental time. In particular, both Alendronate and Pamidronate promote osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, whereas they inhibit osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast function. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据