4.6 Article

Mechanistic aspects of the Fenton reaction under conditions approximated to the extracellular fluid

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 103, 期 1, 页码 28-34

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.08.014

关键词

Highly-reactive oxygen species; Ferryl species; Terephthalate; Stopped-flow kinetics

资金

  1. Fonds zur Forderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung in Osterreich [19335-N17]
  2. Hochschuljubilaumstiftung der Stadt Wien [H-01684/2007]
  3. Science Foundation Ireland
  4. ECRF
  5. Fondazione MPS (Siena, Italy)
  6. ERAB (Brussels, Belgium)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Fenton reaction was investigated, in a medium approximating to that of the extracellular fluid (ECF), by rapid-mixing stopped flow experiments and HPLC analysis using sodium terephthalate (TA(2-)). The reactive intermediate of the Fenton reaction hydroxylates the essentially nonfluorescent, TA(2-) to the brilliant fluorophor 2-hydroxy-terephthalate (OH-TA), which allows the Fenton reaction to be monitored in stopped-flow experiments. There was no artefactual quenching of the fluorescence by substances present in the Fenton-reaction mixture or in the artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF) that might have influenced OH-TA quantification. A mathematical model based on kinetic considerations was developed. This explains the observed independence of the OH-TA concentration on the amount of TA(2-) present in aCSF as well as its dependence on TA(2-) concentration in potassium acetate buffer. A mechanism based on this model, involving complex formation between Fe(II), TA(2-) and H2O2, followed by an intra-molecular hydroxylation accompanied by an intra-molecular electron transfer was developed. The results are consistent with a reactive intermediate, which causes oxidative stress in vivo, not being a free hydroxyl radical, but a ferryl species or a crypto radical. The biological implications of these results are discussed. (c) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据