4.6 Article

Synthesis, characterization, DFT studies and DNA binding of mixed platinum(II) complexes containing quinoxaline and 1,2-dithiolate ligands

期刊

JOURNAL OF INORGANIC BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 77-86

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2007.07.002

关键词

platinum (II) complexes; alpha-diimine ligands; dithiolate ligands; DNA-interactions; quinoxaline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complexes Pt(pq)Cl-2 (1) and Pt(pq)(bdt) (2) (where pq = 2-(2'pyridyl)quinoxaline and bdt = benzene-1,2-dithiolate) have been synthesized and fully characterized by UV-visible (UV-Vis), Fourier Transformer Infrared Spectra (FTIR), 1 and 2D NMR and cyclic voltammetry (CV). Interactions of the tested systems (the aforementioned complexes 1 and 2) and the free ligands pq and bdt with double stranded calf thymus DNA (CT-DNA) were studied by UV-spectrophotometric (melting curves) and circular dichroism (CD) measurements. The results suggest that both complexes 1 and 2, are able to form adducts with DNA and to distort the double helix by changing the base stacking. Complex 2 forms stronger adducts to CT-DNA than complex 1 and this is probably due to the substitution of the chlorine atoms of 1 by the 1,2-dithiolate ligand (bdt) in 2. The latter induces an extensive distortion in the planarity of 2 as density functional theory (DFT) calculations reveal. Besides, the light absorbing complex 2 possess intense mixed metal ligand to ligand charge transfer (MM'LLCT) transition in the visible region of the spectrum and could act as photoluminescent metal-based probe for the study of DNA binding. Thus, the photocleavage of DNA by 2 has been studied by UV-Vis and CD spectra and monitored by agarose gel electrophoresis. Under our experimental conditions, it is unclear that complex 2 can photocleave DNA. Furthermore, the ability of 2 to inhibit proliferation of human tumor cell lines was tested and the results indicate some cytoxytic effect on the SF-286 cells. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据