4.4 Review

Natural Killer Cell Activation Secondary to Innate Pattern Sensing

期刊

JOURNAL OF INNATE IMMUNITY
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 264-273

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000326891

关键词

Natural killer cell activation; Dendritic cell; Toll-like receptor 3; TICAM-1; MyD88

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture
  2. Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan
  3. NorthTec Foundation
  4. Yakult Foundation
  5. Waxman Foundation
  6. Akiyama Life Science Foundation
  7. Sapporo Biocluster 'Bio-S' the Knowledge Cluster Initiative of the MEXT
  8. Program of Founding Research Centers for Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases, MEXT
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22114008] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent progress in understanding the outcomes of pattern-recognition by myeloid dendritic cells (mDC) allows us to delineate the pathways driving natural killer (NK) cell activation. Mouse mDC mature in response to microbial patterns and are converted to an NK cell-activating phenotype. The MyD88 pathway, the Toll/IL-1 receptor homology domain-containing adaptor molecule (TICAM)-1 (TRIF) pathway, and the interferon (IFN)-beta promoter stimulator 1 (IPS-1) pathway in mDC participate in driving NK activation, as shown by analyses in knockout mice. Studies using synthetic compounds for Toll-like receptors/RIG-I-like receptors have demonstrated that mDC-NK cell contact induces NK cell activation without the participation of cytokines in mice. In vivo bone marrow transplantation analysis revealed that the IPS-1 pathway in non myeloid cells and the TICAM-1 pathway in mDC are crucial for dsRNA-mediated in vivo NK activation. These results infer the presence of cytokine-dependent and cytokine-independent modes of NK activation in conjunction with innate immune activation. Here, we focus on the IFN-inducing pathways and mDC-NK contact-induced NK activation and discuss the reported various NK activation modes. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据