4.4 Review

Natural Killer Cell Responses to Infections in Early Life

期刊

JOURNAL OF INNATE IMMUNITY
卷 3, 期 3, 页码 280-288

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000323934

关键词

Natural killer cell; Early life; Newborn; Infant; Infectious disease; Immaturity; Virus; Trypanosoma cruzi

资金

  1. Fond National de la Recherche Scientifique [3461505F, 1.5.284.08F]
  2. Centre de Recherche Interuniversitaire en Vaccinologie
  3. Region Wallonne
  4. Glaxo-Smith-Kline Biologicals (Rixensart, Belgium)
  5. Conseil Interuniversitaire de la Communaute Francaise de Belgique
  6. Fonds Emile Defay (ULB)
  7. Fondation Van Buuren (ULB)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural killer (NK) cells are an important component of innate immune responses to infectious diseases. They mediate protection by being able to rapidly lyse infected cells and produce cytokines (primarily interferon-gamma) that shape innate and adaptive immune responses. This review summarizes current knowledge on the phenotype and functional abilities of NK cells from healthy newborns/infants and on NK cell responses against viral, bacterial and protozoan infections in early life. Interestingly, NK cell blood counts are higher in newborns than in adults but they do not display striking differences in phenotype, except for an increased frequency of expression of the inhibitory CD94/NKG2A receptor. They display some inherent functional defects, mainly a lower cytolytic capacity that may contribute to the immaturity of the neonatal immune system. Changes in circulating levels of NK cells observed during pediatric infections and the ability of NK cells from newborns and children to produce interferon-gamma at the encounter with pathogens indicate that NK cells participate in the immune response to infectious diseases in early life. Unfortunately, information is currently insufficient to assess whether these NK cell responses really contribute to control infections, either vertically transmitted or acquired in infancy. Copyright (C) 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据