4.4 Article

Rat Models to Investigate Host Macrophage Defense against Trypanosoma cruzi

期刊

JOURNAL OF INNATE IMMUNITY
卷 3, 期 1, 页码 71-82

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000320641

关键词

Chagas' disease; Trypanosoma cruzi; Inflammation; Monocytes/macrophages; Innate immunity; Heart; Parasitism; Immunopathology; Rats

资金

  1. Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa Cientifica e Tecnologica (CNPq)
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) [CBB-APQ-01294-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trypanosoma cruzi is the causal agent of Chagas' disease, an infection with a great impact on public health in Latin America. One of the challenges to understand Chagas' disease lies on the complex host-parasite interaction. The understanding of this interaction requires the use of appropriate experimental models that mimic the human disease. Here, we have used two lineages of rats (Wistar and Holtzman) to comparatively evaluate the course of the acute infection (Y strain). Infection was monitored by parasitemia, cardiac and skeletal muscle parasitism and inflammation, heart ultrastructure, recruitment of monocytes/macrophages and nitric oxide, and arginase production by these cells. Although both rats were able to infect, only Holtzman rats developed a marked infection in the cardiac and skeletal muscles, in parallel to a high recruitment of first-line defense cells. A high number of inflammatory macrophages directed parasite clearance. By the end of the acute phase, Holtzman rats showed consistent disease control. Interestingly, parasite killing was not related to nitric oxide production likely inhibited by an arginase-dependent mechanism. Our work demonstrates differential responses of Holtzman and Wistar rats to T. cruzi, and highlights the use of Holtzman rats as useful models for further studies of cardiac/skeletal muscle tropism and innate immune responses that protect the host against parasite replication. This is important for the development of proper therapeutic interventions. Copyright (C) 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据