4.6 Article

Comparison of load responsiveness of cartilage T1rho and T2 in porcine knee joints: an experimental loading MRI study

期刊

OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE
卷 23, 期 10, 页码 1776-1779

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.05.019

关键词

MRI; Cartilage T1rho; Cartilage T2; Staged loading

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan [5293322]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25670645] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To compare changes in T1rho and T2 values of the femoral cartilage in porcine knee joints under staged loading and unloading conditions. Design: Sixteen porcine knee joints with intact capsules and surrounding muscle were imaged using a custom-made pressure device and 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging. Sagittal T1rho and T2 images were obtained for the lateral and medial condyles under the following compression loads: none (Load 0), 140 N (Load 140), 300 N (Load 300), and no compression after decompression (Post-load). The percentage changes of cartilage T1rho and T2 values under each loading condition from those at Load 0 were calculated for weight-bearing overall and eight subdivided regions of interest (ROIs) in both femoral condyles. The actual contact pressure under Load 140 and Load 300 was measured using pressure-sensitive film. Results: For the overall ROI, the mean decreases of T1rho and T2 values were 4.4% and 5.1% under Load 140% and 10.9% and 10.6% under Load 300 in the medial condyle and were 5.2% and 4.0% under Load 140% and 10.6% and 6.0% under Load 300 in the lateral condyle. In the medial condyle, the actual contact pressure correlated highly with percentage changes in T1rho (r = -0.84, P < 0.01) and T2 (r = -0.79, P < 0.01), but those correlations were relatively low in the lateral condyle. Conclusion: Although there were side-dependent variations in the correlations with actual pressure, cartilage T1rho and T2 showed similarly sensitive responses to applied load. (C) 2015 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据