4.8 Article

Cycle aging of commercial NMC/graphite pouch cells at different temperatures

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 154, 期 -, 页码 160-172

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.110

关键词

Lithium-ion battery lifetime; Commercial pouch cell; Cycle aging; Aging mechanisms; Post-mortem analysis; Lithium plating

资金

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation (TEKES)
  2. Aalto University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cycle aging of commercial 40 A h pouch-type lithium-ion cells with NMC/graphite chemistry was studied at different cycling temperatures (room temperature, +45 degrees C, and +45 degrees C charge/+65 degrees C discharge). Aging was observed as capacity fade and resistance increase, and the aging mechanisms were characterized by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and post-mortem analysis, where visual inspection and thickness measurements were employed together with X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), and inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES) analyses. It was observed that elevated temperatures resulted in accelerated capacity fade, especially for the +45 degrees C/+65 degrees C condition. SEI-layer growth and lithium plating, discovered in cell disassembly, were attributed to be the main mechanisms responsible for capacity loss. In addition to the capacity fade, resistance increase was observed both in ohmic and polarization resistances. The ohmic resistance growth was attributed to lack of electrolyte and increased separator resistance. Polarization resistance evolution during cycling was similar at room temperature and at +45 degrees C, but different at the +45 degrees C/+65 degrees C condition. It was concluded that post-mortem analysis is essential for attributing the cycle testing and impedance spectroscopy results to different components and processes inside the cell. For example, the lithium plating phenomenon could not have been predicted or discovered without disassembling the cells. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据