4.7 Article

Characterization of Drug-Resistant Influenza A(H7N9) Variants Isolated From an Oseltamivir-Treated Patient in Taiwan

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 211, 期 2, 页码 249-257

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiu447

关键词

influenza virus; H7N9; oseltamivir; peramivir; R292K; E119V; I222K; I222R; mice; ferrets

资金

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Influenza Division
  2. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
  3. CDC

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Patients contracting influenza A(H7N9) infection often developed severe disease causing respiratory failure. Neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors (NAIs) are the primary option for treatment, but information on drug-resistance markers for influenza A(H7N9) is limited. Methods. Four NA variants of A/Taiwan/1/2013(H7N9) virus containing a single substitution (NA-E119V, NA-I222K, NA-I222R, or NA-R292K) recovered from an oseltamivir-treated patient were tested for NAI susceptibility in vitro; their replicative fitness was evaluated in cell culture, mice, and ferrets. Results. NA-R292K led to highly reduced inhibition by oseltamivir and peramivir, while NA-E119V, NA-I222K, and NA-I222R caused reduced inhibition by oseltamivir. Mice infected with any virus showed severe clinical signs with high mortality rates. NA-I222K virus was the most virulent in mice, whereas virus lacking NA change (NA-WT) and NA-R292K virus seemed the least virulent. Sequence analysis suggests that PB2-S714N increased virulence of NA-I222K virus in mice; NS1-K126R, alone or in combination with PB2-V227M, produced contrasting effects in NA-WT and NA-R292K viruses. In ferrets, all viruses replicated to high titers in the upper respiratory tract but produced only mild illness. NA-R292K virus, showed reduced replicative fitness in this animal model. Conclusions. Our data highlight challenges in assessment of the replicative fitness of H7N9 NA variants that emerged in NAI-treated patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据