4.7 Article

A Shorter Time Interval Between First and Second Dengue Infections Is Associated With Protection From Clinical Illness in a School-based Cohort in Thailand

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 209, 期 3, 页码 360-368

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit436

关键词

dengue; epidemiology; antibodies; immunity; pathogenesis; prospective cohort study

资金

  1. United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Ft Detrick, MD, USA
  2. CDC [1R36CK00104]
  3. NIH [P01 AI034533]
  4. Military Infectious Diseases Research Program (MIDRP)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Despite the strong association between secondary dengue virus (DENV) infections and dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF), the majority of secondary infections are subclinical or mild. The determinants of clinical severity remain unclear, though studies indicate a titer-dependent and time-dependent role of cross-protective anti-DENV antibodies. Methods. Data from 2 sequential prospective cohort studies were analyzed for subclinical and symptomatic DENV infections in schoolchildren in Kamphaeng Phet, Thailand (1998-2002 and 2004-2007). Children experiencing >= 1 DENV infection were selected as the population for analysis (contributing 2169 person-years of follow-up). Results. In total, 1696 children had >= 1 DENV infection detected during their enrollment; 268 experienced 2 or more infections. A shorter time interval between infections was associated with subclinical infection in children seronegative for DENV at enrollment, for whom a second-detected DENV infection is more likely to reflect a true second infection (average of 2.6 years between infections for DHF, 1.9 for DF, and 1.6 for subclinical infections). Conclusions. These findings support a pathogenesis model where cross-reactive antibodies wane from higher-titer, protective levels to lower-titer, detrimental levels. This is one of the first studies of human subjects to suggest a window of cross-protection following DENV infection since Sabin's challenge studies in the 1940s.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据