4.7 Article

Occupational Exposure to Hepatitis C Virus: Early T-Cell Responses in the Absence of Seroconversion in a Longitudinal Cohort Study

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 208, 期 6, 页码 1020-1025

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jit270

关键词

exposure; needlestick; antibody; T cell; hepatitis; healthcare worker

资金

  1. National Institute for Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Health
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Bonn, Germany [We-4675/1-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. T-cell responses have been described in seronegative patients who test negative for hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA despite frequent HCV exposure. However, the cross-sectional design of those studies did not clarify whether T cells were indeed induced by low-level HCV exposure without seroconversion or whether they resulted from regular acute infection with subsequent antibody loss. Methods. Over a 10-year period, our longitudinal study recruited 72 healthcare workers with documented HCV exposure. We studied viremia and antibody and T-cell responses longitudinally for 6 months. Results. All healthcare workers remained negative for HCV RNA and antibodies. However, 48% developed proliferative T-cell response and 42% developed responses in interferon-gamma enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot assays, with 29 healthy HCV-unexposed controls used to define assay cutoffs. The response prevalence was associated with the transmission risk score. T-cell responses peaked at week 4 and returned to baseline by week 12 after exposure. They predominantly targeted nonstructural HCV proteins, which are not part of the HCV particle and thus must have been synthesized in infected cells. Conclusions. Subclinical transmission of HCV occurs frequently, resulting in infection and synthesis of nonstructural proteins despite undetectable systemic viremia. T-cell responses are more sensitive indicators of this low-level HCV exposure than antibodies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据