4.7 Article

Novel In Vitro and In Vivo Models and Potential New Therapeutics to Break the Vicious Cycle of Cryptosporidium Infection and Malnutrition

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 205, 期 9, 页码 1464-1471

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis216

关键词

-

资金

  1. Middle Atlantic Regional Center of Excellence for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Research [U54 AI57168]
  2. National Institutes of Health [D43 TW006578]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Although several animal models of cryptosporidiosis have been reported, most involve genetically or pharmacologically immune-suppressed hosts. Methods. We report challenge with excysted (in vitro and in vivo) and unexcysted (in vivo) Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in human colonic adenocarcinoma (HCT-8) cells and weaned nourished and malnourished C57BL/6 mice, following outcomes of growth rate, stool shedding, and tissue burden. We tested treatment with an oligodeoxynucleotide containing unmethylated CpG motif (CpG-ODN) and alanyl-glutamine in vivo and in vitro. Results. C. parvum-challenged mice showed prolonged weight loss (>10% over 4 days), robust stool shedding (>3 logs/d over 7 days), and epithelial infection in the ileum, cecum, and colon. Of 2 potential therapeutic compounds evaluated in the model, CpG-ODN reduced body weight loss (to <6% on days 3-7 after challenge), reduced shedding of organisms (by 25% on days 1 and 3 after challenge), and decreased the burden of parasites in the ileum. Alanyl-glutamine showed similar benefits. In vitro findings suggested that effects on the epithelial component of the mucosa probably likely responsible for beneficial effects seen in vivo. Conclusions. Weaned mice provide a convenient and reproducible model of cryptosporidial disease, including its vicious cycle with body weight loss and heavier infection with malnutrition, and this model may be useful in exploring innovative therapeutic solutions for this challenging infectious disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据