4.7 Article

HIV Incidence Determination in the United States: A Multiassay Approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 207, 期 2, 页码 232-239

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis659

关键词

HIV; incidence testing; United States; epidemiology

资金

  1. HIV Prevention Trials Network
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  4. National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  5. National Institute of Mental Health
  6. Office of AIDS Research, NIH, DHHS [U01-AI46745, U01-AI48054, UM1-AI068613]
  7. NIAID [R01-AI095068, N01-AI35176, N01-AI-45200, AI-45202]
  8. Division of Intramural Research, NIAID
  9. HIVNET
  10. NIDA [R01-DA-04334, R01-DA12568]
  11. National Cancer Institute
  12. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [U01-AI35042, U01-AI35043, U01-AI35039, U01-AI35040, U01-AI35041, UL1-RR025005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Accurate testing algorithms are needed for estimating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence from cross-sectional surveys. Methods. We developed a multiassay algorithm (MAA) for HIV incidence that includes the BED capture enzyme immunoassay (BED-CEIA), an antibody avidity assay, HIV load, and CD4(+) T-cell count. We analyzed 1782 samples from 709 individuals in the United States who had a known duration of HIV infection (range, 0 to >8 years). Logistic regression with cubic splines was used to compare the performance of the MAA to the BED-CEIA and to determine the window period of the MAA. We compared the annual incidence estimated with the MAA to the annual incidence based on HIV seroconversion in a longitudinal cohort. Results. The MAA had a window period of 141 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 94-150) and a very low false-recent misclassification rate (only 0.4% of 1474 samples from subjects infected for >1 year were misclassified as indicative of recent infection). In a cohort study, annual incidence based on HIV seroconversion was 1.04% (95% CI, .70%-1.55%). The incidence estimate obtained using the MAA was essentially identical: 0.97% (95% CI, .51%-1.71%). Conclusions. The MAA is as sensitive for detecting recent HIV infection as the BED-CEIA and has a very low rate of false-recent misclassification. It provides a powerful tool for cross-sectional HIV incidence determination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据