4.7 Article

Impact of Persistent HIV Replication on CD4 Negative Vγ2Vδ2 T Cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 205, 期 9, 页码 1448-1455

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jis217

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA142458, AI084580]
  2. National Institutes of Health at University of Maryland School of Medicine [T32GM092237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. CD4- V gamma 2V delta 2 T cells are depleted during human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection but can recover to near normal levels in patients who spontaneously control viremia in the absence of therapy. By contrasting V gamma 2V delta 2 T-cell numbers, phenotype, and T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire, we investigate the dynamic tension between active immunity and progressive T-cell destruction during persistent viremia. Methods. Peripheral blood V gamma 2V delta 2 T-cell levels and phenotypes were characterized by flow cytometry. Lymphoproliferation assays measured functional responses. Spectratyping characterized damage to the TCR repertoire. Results. Levels, responses to antigen and the proportion of T effector memory V gamma 2V delta 2 T cells in patients with persistent viremia, were intermediate between patients with natural virus suppression (NVS) and patients receiving antiretroviral therapy. Damage to the TCR gamma-2 chain repertoire and depletion of CD56+ V gamma 2V delta 2 T cells were more pronounced in viremic patients, compared with antiretroviral therapy recipients and patients with natural virus suppression. Conclusions. Characteristics of V gamma 2V delta 2 T cells in viremic patients reflect both active responses (increasing cell numbers, better antigen responses, and higher proportion of effector memory cells) and ongoing damage (repertoire changes and loss of CD561 cells). Unlike patients who control viremia to undetectable levels, V gamma 2V delta 2 T cells are diminished during persistent viremia and may eventually be lost because of progressive destruction of the TCR repertoire.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据