4.7 Article

Natality Decline and Miscarriages Associated With the 1918 Influenza Pandemic: The Scandinavian and United States Experiences

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 204, 期 8, 页码 1157-1164

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir510

关键词

-

资金

  1. Danish Medical Research Council [271-07-0555]
  2. Fogarty International Center
  3. Department of Homeland Security
  4. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health
  5. International Influenza Unit, Office of Global Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Although pregnancy is a recognized risk factor for severe influenza infection, the effect of influenza on miscarriages and births remains unclear. We examined the relationship between influenza and birth rates during the 1918 pandemic in the United States, Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. Methods. We compiled monthly birth rates from 1911 through 1930 in 3 Scandinavian countries and the United States, identified periods of unusually low or high birth rates, and quantified births as missing or in excess of the normal expectation. Using monthly influenza data, we correlated the timing of peak pandemic exposure and depressions in birth rates, and identified pregnancy stages at risk of influenza-related miscarriage. Results. Birth rates declined in all study populations in spring 1919 by a mean of 2.2 births per 1000 persons, representing a 5%-15% drop below baseline levels (P < .05). The 1919 natality depression reached its trough 6.1-6.8 months after the autumn pandemic peak, suggesting that missing births were attributable to excess first trimester miscarriages in similar to 1 in 10 women who were pregnant during the peak of the pandemic. Pandemic-related mortality was insufficient to explain observed patterns. Conclusions. The observed birth depressions were consistent with pandemic influenza causing first trimester miscarriages in similar to 1 in 10 pregnant women. Causality is suggested by temporal synchrony across geographical areas.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据