4.7 Article

Endogenous IL-13 Plays a Crucial Role in Liver Granuloma Maturation During Leishmania donovani Infection, Independent of IL-4Rα-Responsive Macrophages and Neutrophils

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 204, 期 1, 页码 36-43

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jir080

关键词

-

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [065308]
  2. Royal Society
  3. UK Medical Research Council [G0400786]
  4. National Research Foundation, South Africa
  5. EPSRC [EP/E000584/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [G0400786, MC_U105178805] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/E000584/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178805, G0400786] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous studies comparing interleukin 4 receptor alpha (IL-4R alpha)(-/-) and interleukin 4 (IL-4)(-/-) BALB/c mice have indicated that interleukin 13 (IL-13), whose receptor shares the IL-4R alpha subunit with IL-4, plays a protective role during visceral leishmaniasis. We demonstrate that IL-13(-/-) BALB/c mice were less able to control hepatic growth of Leishmania donovani compared with wild-type mice. This correlated with significantly retarded granuloma maturation in IL-13(-/-) mice, defective interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) production, and elevated IL-4 and interleukin 10 (IL-10) levels. L. donovani-infected IL-13(-/-) mice also responded poorly to sodium stibogluconate-mediated chemotherapy compared with wild-type BALB/c mice. Because murine lymphocytes do not have IL-13 receptors, we examined the ability of macrophage/neutrophil-specific IL-4R alpha(-/-) mice to control primary infection with L. donovani and to respond to chemotherapy. Macrophage/neutrophil-specific IL-4R alpha(-/-) mice were as resistant to leishmaniasis as wild-type mice, and chemotherapy retained its efficacy. Consequently, in L. donovani infected BALB/c mice, IL-13 promotes hepatic granuloma formation and controls parasite burdens independently of direct effects on macrophages/neutrophils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据