4.7 Article

Cervical Human Papillomavirus Prevalence in 5 Continents: Meta-Analysis of 1 Million Women with Normal Cytological Findings

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 202, 期 12, 页码 1789-1799

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/657321

关键词

-

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline
  2. Merck Sharp Dohme
  3. Sanofi-Pasteur
  4. Merck
  5. Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Spanish government) [RCESP C03/09, RTICESP C03/10, RTIC RD06/0020/0095]
  6. CIBER en Epidemiologia y Salud Publica
  7. Agencia de Gestio d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (Catalan government) [2009SGR126]
  8. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [V20-181-15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Baseline information on human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and type distribution is highly desirable to evaluate the impact of prophylactic HPV vaccines in the near future. Methods. A meta-analysis was performed of studies published between 1995 and 2009 that used polymerase chain reaction or Hybrid Capture 2 for HPV detection in women with normal cytological findings. Results. The analysis included 194 studies comprising 1,016,719 women with normal cytological findings. The estimated global HPV prevalence was 11.7% (95% confidence interval, 11.6%-11.7%). Sub-Saharan Africa (24.0%), Eastern Europe (21.4%), and Latin America (16.1%) showed the highest prevalences. Age-specific HPV distribution presented with a first peak at younger ages (<25 years) and, in the Americas and Africa, a rebound at older ages (>= 45 years). Among the women with type-specific HPV data (n=215,568), the 5 most common types worldwide were HPV-16 (3.2%), HPV-18 (1.4%), HPV-52 (0.9%), HPV-31 (0.8%), and HPV-58 (0.7%). Conclusions. Although the prevalence of HPV in women with normal cytological findings is high and variable across world regions, HPV types 16, 18, 31, 52, and 58 are consistently found among the 10 most common types in all of them. These results represent the most comprehensive assessment of HPV burden among women with normal cytological findings in the pre-HPV vaccination era worldwide.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据