4.7 Article

Are Host Genetics the Predominant Determinant of Persistent Nasal Staphylococcus aureus Carriage in Humans?

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 202, 期 6, 页码 924-934

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/655901

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire de l'Environnement et du Travail [ES05-001]
  2. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche [05-9-114]
  3. Institut National de la Sante et de la Recherche Medicale [C06-18]
  4. Centre National de Reference (Resistance bacterienne dans les flores commensales)
  5. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage is influenced by multifactorial interactions which are difficult to study in open populations. Therefore, we concomitantly assessed the epidemiological, microbiological, and human-genetic carriage-related factors in a nearly closed population. Methods. In 2006 and 2008, we collected nasal S. aureus strains, human DNA, and epidemiological data from 154 adult Wayampi Amerindians living in an isolated village in the Amazonian forest. The genetics of the strains (multilocus sequence type, spa type, and toxin-content type), epidemiological risk factors, antibiotic exposure, and allelic polymorphism of human genes putatively involved in carriage of the persistent carriers were compared with those of other volunteers. Results. Overall carriage prevalence was 41.7% in 2006 and 57.8% in 2008, but the overall prevalence of persistent carriage was only 26%. The rare and phylogenetically distant multilocus sequence type ST1223 was present in 18.5% of the carriers in 2006 and 34.8% in 2008. No epidemiological factors or antibiotic exposure were significantly associated with persistent carriage, but single nucleotide polymorphism distribution in C-reactive proteins C2042T and C1184T and interleukin-4 C524T genes was significantly associated (P=.02, by global test). Conclusion. Host genetic factors appeared to be the predominant determinant for S. aureus persistent nasal carriage in humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据