4.7 Article

Common Polymorphisms in the NOD2 Gene Region Are Associated with Leprosy and Its Reactive States

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 201, 期 9, 页码 1422-1435

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/651559

关键词

-

资金

  1. Heiser Program for Research in Tuberculosis and Leprosy
  2. National Institutes of Health [AI 22616, AI 54361]
  3. Leprosy Mission International

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Because of its wide spectrum of clinical manifestations and its well-defined immunological complications, leprosy is a useful disease for studying genetic regulation of the host response to infection. We hypothesized that polymorphisms in the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 2 (NOD2) gene, for a cytosolic receptor known to detect mycobacteria, are associated with susceptibility to leprosy and its clinical outcomes. Methods. We used a case-control study design with 933 patients in Nepal. Our study included 240 patients with type 1 (reversal) reactions and 124 patients with type 2 (erythema nodosum leprosum) reactions. We compared the frequencies of 32 common polymorphisms in the NOD2 gene region between patients with the different clinical types of leprosy as well as between the patients and 101 control participants without leprosy. Results. Four polymorphisms were associated with susceptibility to leprosy when comparing allele frequencies, and 8 were associated when comparing genotype frequencies with a dominant model. Five polymorphisms were associated with protection from reversal reaction in an allelic analysis, and 7 were associated with reversal reaction with a dominant model. Four polymorphisms were associated with increased susceptibility to erythema nodosum leprosum in an allelic analysis, whereas 7 of 32 polymorphisms were associated with a dominant model. Conclusion. These data suggest that NOD2 genetic variants are associated with susceptibility to leprosy and the development of leprosy reactive states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据