4.7 Article

Association of Profoundly Impaired Immune Competence in H1N1v-Infected Patients with a Severe or Fatal Clinical Course

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 202, 期 5, 页码 681-689

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/655469

关键词

-

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health Ricerca Corrente-Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico
  2. Istituto Superiore di Sanita [28C5]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Pandemic A/H1N1v influenza is characterized by a mild clinical course. However, a small subset of patients develops a rapidly progressive course caused by primary viral pneumonia or secondary bacterial infections that, in many cases, lead to death due to respiratory failure. The aim of the present study was to analyze the involvement of the immune response in the clinical presentation of H1N1v influenza. Methods. The differentiation and functional capability of T cells from H1N1v-infected patients presenting with either mild disease (n = 22) or severe or fatal disease (n=6) were compared. Moreover, plasma cytokines and chemokines were quantified Results. T cells from H1N1v-infected patients presenting with a severe clinical course resulted in impaired effector cell differentiation and failed to respond to mitogenic stimulation. T cell anergy was strictly associated with a severe acute phase of infection, but T cells could be restored in patients able to recover. Of interest, massive expression of CD95 marker was found on anergic T cells, suggesting an apoptosis-related mechanism. Finally, lower plasma levels of interferon-alpha and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 were found in patients with a worse clinical course of influenza, suggesting impaired production of these cytokines. Conclusions. Our results show a strict association between host immune competence and the severity of the clinical course of H1N1v infection. By monitoring host functional response, patients with an enhanced risk of developing influenza-associated severe complications could be identified in a timely manner.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据