4.7 Article

Genetic and Household Determinants of Predisposition to Human Hookworm Infection in a Brazilian Community

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 202, 期 6, 页码 954-961

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/655813

关键词

-

资金

  1. Human Hookworm Vaccine Initiative of the Sabin Vaccine Institute
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  4. National Institutes of Health
  5. Wellcome Trust [081673]
  6. UK Medical Research Council
  7. European Union

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Predisposition to heavy or light human hookworm infection is consistently reported in treatment-reinfection studies. A significant role for host genetics in determining hookworm infection intensity has also been shown, but the relationship between host genetics and predisposition has not been investigated. Methods. A treatment-reinfection study was conducted among 1302 individuals in Brazil. Bivariate variance components analysis was used to estimate heritability for pretreatment and reinfection intensity and to estimate the contribution of genetic and household correlations between phenotypes to the overall phenotypic correlation (ie, predisposition). Results. Heritability for hookworm egg count was 17% before treatment and 25% after reinfection. Predisposition to heavy or light hookworm infection was observed, with a phenotypic correlation of 0.34 between pretreatment and reinfection intensity. This correlation was reduced to 0.23 after including household and environmental covariates. Genetic and household correlations were 0.41 and 1, respectively, and explained 88% of the adjusted phenotypic correlation. Conclusions. Predisposition to human hookworm infection in this area results from a combination of host genetics and consistent differences in exposure, with the latter explained by household and environmental factors. Unmeasured individual-specific differences in exposure did not contribute to predisposition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据