4.7 Article

Mortality Patterns Associated with the 1918 Influenza Pandemic in Mexico: Evidence for a Spring Herald Wave and Lack of Preexisting Immunity in Older Populations

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 202, 期 4, 页码 567-575

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/654897

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Directorate, Department of Homeland Security
  2. Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health
  3. Office of Global Health Affairs' International Influenza Unit, Office of the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Although the mortality burden of the devastating 1918 influenza pandemic has been carefully quantified in the United States, Japan, and European countries, little is known about the pandemic experience elsewhere. Here, we compiled extensive archival records to quantify the pandemic mortality patterns in 2 Mexican cities, Mexico City and Toluca. Methods. We applied seasonal excess mortality models to age-specific respiratory mortality rates for 1915-1920 and quantified the reproduction number from daily data. Results. We identified 3 pandemic waves in Mexico City in spring 1918, autumn 1918, and winter 1920, which were characterized by unusual excess mortality among people 25-44 years old. Toluca experienced 2-fold higher excess mortality rates than Mexico City but did not experience a substantial third wave. All age groups, including that of people >= 65 years old, experienced excess mortality during 1918-1920. Reproduction number estimates were < 2.5, assuming a 3-d generation interval. Conclusion. Mexico experienced a herald pandemic wave with elevated young adult mortality in spring 1918, similar to the United States and Europe. In contrast to the United States and Europe, there was no mortality sparing among Mexican seniors >= 65 years old, highlighting potential geographical differences in preexisting immunity to the 1918 virus. We discuss the relevance of our findings to the 2009 pandemic mortality patterns.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据