4.7 Article

Quantitative Trait Loci Associated with Susceptibility to Bladder and Kidney Infections Induced by Escherichia coli in Female C3H/HeJ Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 199, 期 3, 页码 355-361

出版社

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/595987

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK044378-10S1, R01 DK061574, R01 DK044378-10, DK61574, R56 DK061574, R01 DK061574-02, R01 DK061574-05, DK44378, R01 DK061574-04, R01 DK044378-09, R01 DK061574-03, R01 DK061574-01A2, R01 DK044378-08] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The C3H/HeJ mouse strain develops severe bladder and kidney infections after receiving intravesical inoculation with uropathogenic Escherichia coli. This susceptibility is genetically determined, but the specific genes involved have not been completely defined. The objective of the present study was to use quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping to identify chromosomal sites associated with susceptibility to infection in C3H/HeJ mice. Methods. Female mice from a backcross of C3H/HeJ and (BALB/c x C3H/HeJ) F(1) mice were inoculated with E. coli, and the number of E. coli colony-forming units present in the bladder and kidneys was quantified 10 days later. Genomic DNA was scanned using microsatellite markers to localize chromosomal segments derived from parental strains. Statistical analyses associated infection phenotypes with chromosomal sites. Results. A highly significant QTL for susceptibility to bladder infection was identified on chromosome 4, and C3H/HeJ alleles at this locus interacted with BALB/c alleles on chromosome 19 to increase the severity of infection. A significant QTL on chromosome 6 was associated with severe kidney infections. Conclusions. Increased susceptibility to E. coli bladder and kidney infections in female C3H/HeJ mice is associated with specific chromosomal sites located near genes contributing to host resistance to infection. The results demonstrate the multigenic nature of susceptibility to urinary tract infections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据