4.7 Article

CD73 Is Expressed by Human Regulatory T Helper Cells and Suppresses Proinflammatory Cytokine Production and Helicobacter felis-Induced Gastritis in Mice

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 199, 期 4, 页码 494-504

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/596205

关键词

-

资金

  1. Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America
  2. National Institutes of Health [DK50980, AI069880, AI70491, RR00175]
  3. University of Virginia Digestive Health Research Center [DK 56703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Regulatory T cells (known as Treg) express apyrases (CD39) and ecto-5'-nucleotidase (CD73) and contribute to their inhibitory function by generating adenosine. We investigated the expression of CD39 and CD73 on human T helper (Th) cells and the role of CD73 in regulating Helicobacter felis-induced gastritis and colonization. Methods. Human CD4(+) Th cells, gastric T cells, or Treg subsets were stimulated and assayed for the expression of CD39 and CD73 by means of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry. The effect of CD73 on proliferation and cytokine production was assessed, and the presence of gastritis, proinflammatory cytokine expression, or colonization of H. felis was evaluated in CD73-deficient (CD73(-/-)) mice or recipient mice given control or CD73(-/-) Treg. Results. CD4(+) T cells expressed CD39 and CD73, particularly in CD25(+)Foxp3(+) Treg from peripheral blood or gastric mucosa. Activation significantly increased CD73 expression on all Th cells. Inhibition of CD73 enhanced production of interferon-gamma. Gastritis in H. felis-infected CD73(-/-) mice was significantly worse than that in wild-type mice and was accompanied by increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines and reduced bacterial colonization, whereas Treg from CD73(-/-) mice did not inhibit gastritis. Conclusion. CD39 and CD73 expressed by Th cells contribute to local accumulation of adenosine and attenuation of gastritis, which may favor persistent infection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据