4.7 Article

Variants in the toll-like receptor signaling pathway and clinical outcomes of malaria

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 198, 期 5, 页码 772-780

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1086/590440

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Malaria is one of the most significant infectious diseases in the world and is responsible for a large proportion of infant deaths. Toll-like receptors (TLRs), key components of innate immunity, are central to countering infection. Variants in the TLR-signaling pathway are associated with susceptibility to infectious diseases. Methods. We genotyped single nucleotide polymorphisms ( SNPs) of the genes associated with the TLR-signaling pathway in patients with mild malaria and individuals with asymptomatic Plasmodium infections by means of polymerase chain reaction. Results. Genotype distributions for the TLR-1 I602S differed significantly between patients with mild malaria and persons with asymptomatic infection. The TLR-1 602S allele was associated with an odds ratio ( OR) of 2.2 ( P = .003; P-corrected = .015) for malaria among patients with mild malaria due to any Plasmodium species and 2.1 ( P = .015; P-corrected = .75) among patients with mild malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum only. The TLR-6 S249P SNP showed an excess of homozygotes for the TLR-6 249P allele in asymptomatic persons, compared with patients with mild malaria due to any Plasmodium species (OR 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.2; P = .01; P-corrected = .05), suggesting that the TLR-6 249S allele may be a risk factor for malaria ( OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7; P = 0.01; P-corrected = .05). The TLR-9-1486C allele showed a strong association with high parasitemia ( P < .001). Conclusions. Our findings indicate that the TLR-1 and TLR- 6 variants are significantly associated with mild malaria, whereas the TLR-9-1486C/T variants are associated with high parasitemia. These discoveries may bring additional understanding to the pathogenesis of malaria.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据