4.7 Article

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection: A pooled analysis of five prospective, observational studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 68, 期 3, 页码 242-251

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.015

关键词

Staphylococcus aureus; bloodstream infection; Bacteraemia; Mortality; Pooled analysis

资金

  1. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-CSF4-Torok] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NIAID NIH HHS [K24 AI093969, K24-AI093969, R01 AI068804, R01-AI068804] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia is a common, often fatal infection. Our aim was to describe how its clinical presentation varies between populations and to identify common determinants of outcome. Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis on 3395 consecutive adult patients with S. aureus bacteraemia. Patients were enrolled between 2006 and 2011 in five prospective studies in 20 tertiary care centres in Germany, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States. Results: The median age of participants was 64 years (interquartile range 50-75 years) and 63.8% were male. 25.4% of infections were associated with diabetes mellitus, 40.7% were nosocomial, 20.6% were caused by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), although these proportions varied significantly across studies. Intravenous catheters were the commonest identified infective focus (27.7%); 8.3% had endocarditis. Crude 14 and 90-day mortality was 14.6% and 29.2%, respectively. Age, MRSA bacteraemia, nosocomial acquisition, endocarditis, and pneumonia were independently associated with death, but a strong association was with an unidentified infective focus (adjusted hazard ratio for 90-day mortality 2.92; 95% confidence interval 2.33 to 3.67, p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The baseline demographic and clinical features of S. aureus bacteraemia vary significantly between populations. Mortality could be reduced by assiduous MRSA control and early identification of the infective focus. (C) 2013 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据