4.7 Article

Bacterial co-infection with H1N1 infection in patients admitted with community acquired pneumonia

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 65, 期 3, 页码 223-230

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.04.009

关键词

Influenza A H1N1 pneumonia; Bacterial co-infection; Community-acquired pneumonia

资金

  1. CibeRes [CB06/06/0028]
  2. Programa de Investigacion en Gripe-ISCiii-McyT
  3. IDIBAPS
  4. [2009 SGR 911]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Bacterial co-infection is an important contributor to morbidity and mortality during influenza pandemics. We investigated the incidence, risk factors and outcome of patients with influenza A H1N1 pneumonia and bacterial co-infection. Methods: Prospective observational study of consecutive hospitalized patients with influenza A H1N1 virus and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). We compared cases with and without bacterial co-infection. Results: The incidence of influenza A H1N1 infection in CAP during the pandemic period was 19% (n, 667). We studied 128 patients; 42(33%) had bacterial co-infection. The most frequently isolated bacterial pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (26, 62%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (6, 14%). Predictors for bacterial co-infection were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and increase of platelets count. The hospital mortality was 9%. Factors associated with mortality were age >= 65 years, presence of septic shock and the need for mechanical ventilation. Although patients with bacterial co-infection presented with higher Pneumonia Severity Index risk class, hospital mortality was similar to patients without bacterial co-infection (7% vs. 11%, respectively, p = 0.54). Conclusion: Bacterial co-infection was frequent in influenza A H1N1 pneumonia, with COPD and increased platelet count as the main predictors. Although associated with higher severe scales at admission, bacterial co-infection did not influence mortality of these patients. (C) 2012 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据