4.7 Article

A simple model to predict bacteremia in women with acute pyelonephritis

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 63, 期 2, 页码 124-130

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.06.007

关键词

Pyelonephritis; Bacteremia; Logistic models; Risk assessment; Community-acquired infections

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To construct a simple model to predict bacteremia in women with uncomplicated acute pyelonephritis (APN) for the judicious use of blood cultures. Methods: A prospective database including 735 women with uncomplicated APN at an academic urban emergency department was analyzed retrospectively. Independent risk factors were determined using multivariate logistic regression in two-thirds of patients. Cutoff values representing 10% and 30% of risk were selected for the stratification. This model was internally and externally validated using a remaining one-thirds of patients and 169 independent patients, respectively. Results: Independent risk factors were as follows: age >= 65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 5.18, 4 points), vomiting (OR = 2.40, 2 points), heart rate > 110 beats/min (OR = 2.35, 2 points), segmented neutrophils > 90% (OR = 3.17, 3 points), and urine WBC >= 50/HPF (OR = 4.27, 4 points). Patients were stratified as low (points < 4), intermediate (points, 4-6), or high risk (7 <= points). The areas under receiver operating characteristics curves were 0.707 and 0.792 in internal and external validation cohorts, respectively. The model stratified internal and external validation cohort into low (8.5% and 5.7%), intermediate (16.5% and 14.8%), and high risk of bacteremia (42.0% and 56.4%). Conclusions: This model provides a useful tool to predict the risk of bacteremia, which can be helpful to decide whether to perform blood cultures and whether to admit the patient for the intravenous antibiotics in women with uncomplicated APN. (C) 2011 The British Infection Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据