4.7 Article

Mycobacterium xenopi pulmonary disease - Epidemiology and clinical features in non-immunocompromised patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 108-112

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.01.001

关键词

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); Mycobacteriosis; Mycobacterium xenopi; Non-tuberculous mycobacteria

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: The genus Mycobacterium has more than 120 well-characterized species. Although the incidence of tuberculosis has decreased over the studied period, other, non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are isolated more often. Since, Mycobacterium xenopi is the most frequent NTM isolate in Croatia we studied its epidemiology and clinical relevance. Methods: We performed a retrospective study over a 25-year period determining epidemiology, radiological findings and clinical importance of M. xenopi infection, obtaining data from archives in health care institutions from all over the country. Results: We detected 40 patients with a positive isolate of M. xenopi. Twenty-four patients met American Thoracic Society criteria for pulmonary disease. Eighteen (90%) of treated patients were mate, on average 61.7 years old. Nineteen (95%) patients lived in towns. Most of them had comorbid disease, 18 (90%), with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) being the most frequent, found in 11 (55%) patients. All patients were immunocompetent. We found COPD as the most frequent comorbid disease in the group of patients with worse treatment response (n = 8; 80%), white in patients with good treatment response COPI) was less frequent (n = 3; 30%). Differences in the proportions of patients with COPD were significant (p = 0.037). Conclusion: In patients with M. xenopi pulmonary infection, COPD is a predisposing condition, and as a comorbid disease, is an important prognostic factor for treatment response. (C) 2009 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据