4.7 Article

Incidence and clinical impact of extended-spectrum-β-lactamase (ESBL) production and fluoroquinolone resistance in bloodstream infections caused by Escherichia coli in patients with hematological malignancies

期刊

JOURNAL OF INFECTION
卷 58, 期 4, 页码 299-307

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.02.002

关键词

Escherichia coli; Fluoroquinolone resistance; Extended-spectrum-beta-lactamases; Bloodstream infections; Hematological malignancies

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To identify risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from hematological malignancies with concurrent bacteremia caused by Escherichia coli. Particular attention was focused on defining the impact of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase (ESBL) production and fluoroquinolone resistance by the bacterial. isolates on mortality. Materials and methods: A retrospective eight-year cohort study design was employed. The outcome measured was death within 30 days of the first positive blood culture. Survivor and non-survivor subgroups were compared to identify predictors of mortality. Results: A total of 62 episodes of bacteremia caused by E. coli were analyzed. The overall incidences of ESBL production and fluoroquinolone resistance were 41.9% and 62.9%, respectively. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 20.9% (13/62). In a multivariate analysis, significant predictors of mortality were inadequate initial antimicrobial therapy (OR = 14.96, 95% CI 1.95-114.51; P = 0.009), infection caused by ESBL-producing isolates (OR = 8.84, 95% CI 1.48-52.91; P = 0.01), and prolonged neutropenia (OR = 8.10, 95% CI 1.29-50.57; P = 0.02). Conclusions: Sound knowledge of the local distribution of pathogens and their susceptibility patterns and prompt initiation of effective antimicrobial treatment are essential in patients suffering from hematological malignancies with BSIs caused by E. coli. (c) 2009 The British Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据