4.2 Article

A pilot study of ambulatory masticatory muscle activities in temporomandibular joint disorders diagnostic groups

期刊

ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH
卷 18, 期 -, 页码 146-155

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12085

关键词

ambulatory; duty factor; electromyographic; masticatory muscle; temporomandibular joint disorder

资金

  1. NIDCR [R01 DE016417]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Structured Abstract ObjectiveTo determine differences in masticatory muscle usage between temporomandibular joint disorders diagnostic groups. Setting and sample populationSeventy-one informed and consented subjects (27 men; 44 women) participated at the University at Buffalo. Material and methodsResearch diagnostic criteria and imaging data were used to categorize subjects according to the presence/absence (+/-) of TMJ disc placement (DD) and chronic pain (P) (+DD+P, n=18; +DD-P, n=14; -DD-P, n=39). Electromyographic (EMG)/bite-force calibrations determined subject-specific masseter and temporalis muscle activities per 20N bite-force (T-20N, V). Over 3days and nights, subjects collected EMG recordings. Duty factors (DFs, % of recording time) were determined based on threshold intervals (5-9, 10-24, 25-49, 50-79, 80% T-20N). anova and Tukey-Kramer post hoc tests identified 1) diagnostic group differences in T-20N and 2) the effects of diagnostic group, gender, time and interval on muscle DFs. ResultsMean (SE) temporalis T-20N in +DD+P subjects was significantly higher (71.4 +/- 8.8V) than masseter T-20N in these subjects (19.6 +/- 8.8V; p=0.001) and in -DD-P subjects (25.3 +/- 6.0V, p=0.0007). Masseter DFs at 5-9% T-20N were significantly higher in +DD-P women (3.48%) than +DD-P men (0.85%) and women and men in both other diagnostic groups (all p<0.03), and in +DD+P women (2.00%) compared to -DD-P men (0.83%; p=0.029). Night-time DFs at 5-9% T-20N in +DD-P women (1.97%) were significantly higher than in -DD-P men (0.47%) and women (0.24%; all p<0.01). ConclusionsBetween-group differences were found in masticatory muscle activities in both laboratory and natural environmental settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据