4.5 Article

Effect of processing parameters on free surface electrospinning from a stepped pyramid stage

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL TEXTILES
卷 45, 期 4, 页码 483-494

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1528083714537101

关键词

Free surface electrospinning; response surface methodology; nanofiber

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51373033, 11172064]
  2. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China [200961]
  3. Shanghai Rising-Star Program in China [10QA1400100]
  4. Fok Ying Tong Education Foundation [121071]
  5. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-10-0322]
  6. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  7. Shu Guang'' project - Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [11SG33]
  8. Shanghai Education Development Foundation
  9. Chinese Universities Scientific Fund [CUSF-DH-D-2013021]
  10. Keygrant Project of Chinese Ministry of Education [113027A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an improved free surface electrospinning was applied to large-scale production of polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers by utilizing a stepped pyramid stage. Multiple polymer jets were observed to form on the edges of the stepped pyramid stage. The influences of operating parameters (e.g. polymer solution concentration, applied voltage and collecting distance) on fiber diameter as well as productivity were experimentally investigated. Response surface methodology was utilized to obtain a quantitative relationship between selected electrospinning parameters and the average fiber diameters as well as the productivity, and the analysis of variance has been used to the statistical validation of regression models. Adjusted R-squared was found to be 98.79% and 98.55% for the fiber diameter and productivity, respectively. The results indicated that the solution concentration had a statistically significant effect on the fiber diameter and the applied potential influence, largely on the productivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据