4.5 Article

Enhanced production of L-phenylalanine in Corynebacterium glutamicum due to the introduction of Escherichia coli wild-type gene aroH

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-013-1262-x

关键词

L-phenylalanine; Corynebacterium glutamicum; aroH; Metabolic engineering

资金

  1. Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [31130043]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31200020, 31000054, 31171638]
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  4. Jiangsu Planned Projects for Postdoctoral Research Funds [1101053C]
  5. Independent Innovation Program of Jiangnan University [JUSRP111A23]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Metabolic engineering is a powerful tool which has been widely used for producing valuable products. For improving l-phenylalanine (l-Phe) accumulation in Corynebacterium glutamicum, we have investigated the target genes involved in the biosynthetic pathways. The genes involved in the biosynthesis of l-Phe were found to be strictly regulated genes by feedback inhibition. As a result, overexpression of the native wild-type genes aroF, aroG or pheA resulted in a slight increase of l-Phe. In contrast, overexpression of aroF (wt) or pheA (fbr) from E. coli significantly increased l-Phe production. Co-overexpression of aroF (wt) and pheA (fbr) improved the titer of l-Phe to 4.46 +/- A 0.06 g l(-1). To further analyze the target enzymes in the aromatic amino acid synthesis pathway between C. glutamicum and E. coli, the wild-type gene aroH from E. coli was overexpressed and evaluated in C. glutamicum. As predicted, upregulation of the wild-type gene aroH resulted in a remarkable increase of l-Phe production. Co-overexpression of the mutated pheA (fbr) and the wild-type gene aroH resulted in the production of l-Phe up to 4.64 +/- A 0.09 g l(-1). Based on these results we conclude that the wild-type gene aroH from E. coli is an appropriate target gene for pathway engineering in C. glutamicum for the production of aromatic amino acids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据