4.5 Article

Improvement of lipid production in the marine strains Alexandrium minutum and Heterosigma akashiwo by utilizing abiotic parameters

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-011-1016-6

关键词

Microalgae; Dinoflagellates; Raphidophytes; Lipids; Biofuel; Triacylglycerols

资金

  1. Comision Nacional de Investigacion Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONICYT), Chile
  2. Ramon y Cajal of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two different strains of microalgae, one raphidophyte and one dinoflagellate, were tested under different abiotic conditions with the goal of enhancing lipid production. Whereas aeration was crucial for biomass production, nitrogen deficiency and temperature were found to be the main abiotic parameters inducing the high-level cellular accumulation of neutral lipids. Net neutral lipid production and especially triacylglycerol (TAG) per cell were higher in microalgae (> 200% in Alexandrium minutum, and 30% in Heterosigma akashiwo) under treatment conditions (25A degrees C; 330 mu M NaNO3) than under control conditions (20A degrees C; 880 mu M NaNO3). For both algal species, oil production (free fatty acids plus TAG fraction) was also higher under treatment conditions (57 mg L-1 in A. minutum and 323 mg L-1 in H. akashiwo). Despite the increased production and accumulation of lipids in microalgae, the different conditions did not significantly change the fatty acids profiles of the species analyzed. These profiles consisted of saturated fatty acids (SAFA) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) in significant proportions. However, during the stationary phase, the concentrations per cell of some PUFAs, especially arachidonic acid (C20:4n6), were higher in treated than in control algae. These results suggest that the adjustment of abiotic parameters is a suitable and one of the cheapest alternatives to obtain sufficient quantities of microalgal biomass, with high oil content and minimal changes in the fatty acid profile of the strains under consideration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据