4.5 Article

Production and optimization of cellulase-free, alkali-stable xylanase by Bacillus pumilus SV-85S in submerged fermentation

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-009-0650-8

关键词

Xylanase; Bacillus pumilus; Response surface methodology; Submerged fermentation; Production; Central composite design

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, New Delhi
  2. University Grants Commission, India
  3. Rajiv Gandhi National Fellowship Scheme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports the production of a cellulase-free and alkali-stable xylanase in high titre from a newly isolated Bacillus pumilus SV-85S using cheap and easily available agro-residue wheat bran. Optimization of fermentation conditions enhanced the enzyme production to 2995.20 +/- A 200.00 IU/ml, which was 9.91-fold higher than the activity under unoptimized basal medium (302.2 IU/ml). Statistical optimization using response-surface methodology was employed to obtain a cumulative effect of peptone, yeast extract, and potassium nitrate (KNO3) on enzyme production. A 2(3) central composite design best optimized the nitrogen source at the 0 level for peptone and yeast extract and at the -alpha level for KNO3, along with 5.38-fold increase in xylanase activity. Addition of 0.1% tween 80 to the medium increased production by 1.5-fold. Optimum pH for xylanase was 6.0. The enzyme was 100% stable over the pH range from 5 to 11 for 1 h at 37A degrees C and it lost no activity, even after 3 h of incubation at pH 7, 8, and 9. Optimum temperature for the enzyme was 50A degrees C, but the enzyme displayed 78% residual activity even at 65A degrees C. The enzyme retained 50% activity after an incubation of 1 h at 60A degrees C. Characteristics of B. pumilus SV-85S xylanase, including its cellulase-free nature, stability in alkali over a long duration, along with high-level production, are particularly suited to the paper and pulp industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据