4.6 Article

International Cooperation for Metal Recycling From Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment An Assessment of the Best-of-Two-Worlds Approach

期刊

JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY
卷 15, 期 1, 页码 13-30

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2010.00307.x

关键词

electronic waste (e-waste); hazardous substances; industrial ecology; international trade; precious metals; resource recovery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article addresses a market-based management concept for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) known as the best-of-two-worlds approach. The concept is based on the idea that recyclers in developing countries and emerging economies can cooperate with technologically advanced refineries in industrialized countries to facilitate efficient recovery of valuable metals, such as gold and palladium, from e-waste. The article provides an overview of technical and environmental concerns underlying the concept and sheds light on the political framework, the waste-related trade issues, and the resource economics that need to be considered for further decision making. Building on this synthesis, I conduct a qualitative assessment of sustainability impacts of the proposed concept by analyzing two scenarios and their associated risks. The analysis suggests that, under certain preconditions, the best-of-two-worlds concept could yield significant improvements in terms of management of hazardous substances, resource efficiency, greenhouse gas emissions, income generation, and investments into social and environmental standards. Generally, two potential implementation scenarios were identified: Whereas under Scenario 1 only WEEE generated within developing countries and emerging economies is managed through the best-of-two-worlds approach, Scenario 2 additionally incorporates WEEE imported from industrialized countries. Although both scenarios can yield a variety of benefits, Scenario 2 might cause a net flow of hazardous substances from industrialized countries into developing countries and emerging economies, thus leading to less beneficial sustainability impacts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据