4.7 Article

Hydrogen production from CO2 reforming of methane over high pressure H2O2 modified different semi-cokes

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2013.10.064

关键词

Hydrogen production; Hydrogen peroxide modification; Semi-coke; Carbon dioxide reforming of methane; Syngas

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2005CB221202]
  2. National Science & Technology Pillar Program [2012BAA04B03]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [21006066, 21376003, 51274147]
  4. Shanxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2011021009-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

H2O2 was used under different temperatures and pressures to activate three kinds of different semi-cokes. FTIR, BET, SEM and Boehm titration were used to analyze properties of the semi-cokes surfaces, finding that catalytic activities of these semi-cokes after modification by high temperature and high pressure H2O2 were improved. FTIR shows that the characteristic infrared absorption peak of functional groups on the semi-cokes surface does not change, but the absorption peak intensity of some functional groups is increased. The strength of -OH absorption peak of Hongce lignite (HCL) semi-coke at 3444 cm(-1), carboxyl C=O at 1598 cm(-I), aliphatic ether, cyclic ether and other organic functional groups at 1023 cm(-1) in the modified Shenmu bituminous(SMB) semi-coke and Jincheng anthracite (JCA) semi-coke are increased significantly. BET finds that the specific surface area and pore volume of three semi-cokes are increased after modification. Boehm titration shows that the basic functional group content in semi-coke is increased after modification, and the net alkali content is increased significantly. Compared with the raw semi-coke, SEM shows that the surface of semi-coke modified with H2O2 becomes rough. Modified JCA semi-coke surface pitted with holes, modified HCL and SMB semi-coke surface present porous. (C) 2013 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据