4.7 Article

Conversion of syngas to C2+ oxygenates over Rh-based/SiO2 catalyst: The promoting effect of Fe

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.10.021

关键词

Fe promoter; Rh-Mn-Li/SiO2; CO hydrogenation; C-2(+) oxygenates

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [08520513600]
  2. Leading Academic Discipline Project of Shanghai Education Committee [J51503]
  3. Shanghai Special Fund for Outstanding Young Teachers [yyy10083]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of Fe promoter on the catalytic properties of Rh-Mn-Li/SiO2 catalyst for CO hydrogenation was investigated. The catalysts were comprehensively characterized by means of X-ray diffraction (XRD), N-2 adsorption-desorption, temperature programmed reduction (TPR), temperature programmed desorption (TPD), temperature programmed surface reaction (TPSR), and diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS). Activity testing results showed that low loading of Fe (<= 0.1 wt%) improved the reactivity and yield of C-2(+) oxygenates; however, the opposite effect appeared at the high values of Fe (>0.1 wt%). Characterization results suggested that the addition of Fe strengthened the Rh-Mn interaction and increased the desorption/transformation rate of adsorbed CO, which could be responsible for the increase of CO conversion. But on the other hand, the existence of Fe might deposit over the Rh surface, and decreased the number of active sites, resulting in the decrease of CO conversion when the Fe amount was excessive. The selectivity to C-2(+) oxygenates varied inversely with the reducibility of Rh oxide species. Moreover, it is proposed that the transformation of dicarbonyl Rh(CO)(2) into H-Rh-CO is favorable for the formation of C-2(+) oxygenates, and the hydrogenation ability of Fe can increase the hydrogenation of acetaldehyde to ethanol. (C) 2012 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据