4.7 Article

Development of novel grafted hybrid PVA membranes using glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride for pervaporation separation of water-isopropanol mixtures

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2012.08.032

关键词

Poly(vinyl alcohol); GTMAC; Isopropanol; Pervaporation; Selectivity; Activation energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tetraethylorthosilicate incorporated hybrid poly(vinyl alcohol) membranes were grafted with glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride (GTMAC) in different mass%. The resulting membranes were subjected to physico-chemical investigations using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetry analysis (TGA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The effects of grafting and feed composition on pervaporation performance of the membranes were systematically investigated. The membrane containing 30 mass% of GTMAC exhibited the highest separation selectivity of 1570 with a flux of 1.92 x 10(-2) kg/m(2) h at 30 degrees C for 10 mass% of water in the feed. The total flux and flux of water are almost overlapping each other, manifesting that these membranes could be used effectively to break the azeotropic point of water-isopropanol mixtures. From the temperature dependent diffusion and permeation values, the Arrhenius activation parameters were estimated. The activation energy values obtained for water permeation (E-pw) are two to three times lower than those of isopropanol permeation (E-pIPA), suggesting that the developed membranes have higher separation ability for water-isopropanol system. The E-p and E-D values ranged between 63.73 and 33.07, and 62.78 and 32.75 kJ/mol, respectively. The positive heat of sorption (Delta H-s) values was obtained for all the membranes, suggesting that Henry's mode of sorption is predominant in the process. (c) 2012 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据