4.8 Article

A proposed compressed air drying method using pressurized liquid desiccant and experimental verification

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 80-89

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.12.015

关键词

Compressed air; Liquid desiccant; Drying; Waste heat utilization; Experiment

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51376043]
  2. Foundation for Distinguished Young Scientists of Jiangsu Province [BK20140026]
  3. Foundation for the Author of National Excellent Doctoral Dissertation of PR China [201334]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel compressed air drying method using pressurized liquid desiccant is proposed in this paper. The compressed air drying system is consisted of a compressed air module, a pressurized liquid desiccant dehumidifier, a liquid desiccant regenerator working in an atmospheric pressure, and other auxiliary components. An experimental apparatus of the pressurized liquid desiccant dehumidifier associated with a compressed air module is established to verify the proposed air drying method experimentally. The results show that, under the pressure of 0.5 MPa, the moisture content in the outlet air can reach 0.9 g/kg. The moisture content of the outlet air reaches 1.4 g/kg under the pressure of 0.3 MPa, and the power consumption of the drying system is 6.17 kJ/g, which is 0.69 kJ/g and 10.1% lower than the conventional compressed air cooling drying system. The dehumidification efficiency is around 0.90, indicating the sufficiently mass transfer between compressed air and solution in pressurized dehumidifier. Besides, the proposed compressed air drying system can use the low-grade heat from the air compressor to regenerate the diluted desiccant solution. The novel air drying method is verified to offer very dry air for industrial application, and shows significant energy saving potential compared with the conventional compressed air cooling drying system. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据