4.4 Article

Establishment and Large-scale Expansion of Minimally cultured Young Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes for Adoptive Transfer Therapy

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 34, 期 2, 页码 212-220

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e318209c94c

关键词

tumor infiltration lymphocyte; adoptive cell transfer; metastatic melanoma; short-term culture

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Treatment of metastatic melanoma patients with adoptively transferred tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) has developed into an effective therapy. Various studies reported objective responses of 50% and more. The use of unselected, minimally cultured, bulk TIL (Young-TIL) has simplified the TIL production process and may therefore, allow the accessibility of this approach to cancer centers worldwide. This article describes the precise process leading to the large-scale production of Young-TIL for therapy. We have enrolled 55 melanoma patients and optimized their Young-TIL generation process. Young-TIL cultures were successfully established for 51 of 55 (93%) patients in 16.7 +/- 5.5 days. In a large-scale expansion procedure Young-TIL of 32 patients were further expanded to treatment levels, resulting in a final number of 4.5 x 10(10) +/- 2.0 x 10(10) TIL. Fifteen of 31 (48%) patients, who were evaluated, achieved a clinical response, including 4 complete and 11 partial responses. We confirmed the significant correlation between short culture duration, high number of infused cells, and tumor regression. A high percentage of CD8(+) T cells in the infusion product was beneficial to achieve an objective response. All responding patients were treated with Young-TIL cultures established in < 20 days. In summary, we describe here an efficient and reliable method to generate Young-TIL for adoptive transfer therapy, which may easily be adopted by other cancer centers and can lead to objective responses in 50% of refractory melanoma patients. In the future this approach may be used also in other types of malignancies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据