4.4 Article

Toxicity and activity of a twice daily high-dose bolus interleukin 2 regimen in patients with metastatic melanoma and metastatic renal cell cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 569-576

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CJI.0b013e318177a4ba

关键词

interleukin-2; high dose; metastatic renal cancer; metastatic melanoma; toxicity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The standard q8h high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimen produces clear benefit for a subset of patients, but has limited acceptance because of its substantial acute toxicity including hypotension requiring pressors in 30% to 50%, the schedule is inconvenient for medical staff who must assess patients before each dose, and in some hospitals, the limited availability of monitored beds. We initiated a high-dose IL-2 program with a modified twice daily dosing schedule, limited the total number of doses per course to 8, and treated patients in an oncology ward without cardiac monitoring. Hypotension was managed preferentially with normal saline fluid boluses and/or delay in treatment. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 41 consecutive metastatic melanoma (n = 3) and renal cancer (n = 8) patients treated with the modified high-dose IL-2 regimen. The median number of IL-2 doses administered in the first cycle was 15. Overall toxicity was similar to published data for the q8h schedule, but only 9.79% of patients required pressors. Twenty-four percent of patients were transferred electively or emergently to the intensive care unit. There were no treatment-related deaths. The objective response rate was 12.5% and 0% in melanoma and renal cancer, respectively. Responses were durable, and 2 additional melanoma patients with mixed responses remain disease-free after resection of residual or recurrent sites of disease. In summary, the twice-daily IL-2 regimen has meaningful activity, may be more convenient to administer, reduces the need for elective monitored beds, and may be preferable for development of combinations with newer immune modulators.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据