4.6 Article

Differential Requirement for Nfil3 during NK Cell Development

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 192, 期 6, 页码 2667-2676

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302605

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [APP1027472]
  2. Victorian State Government
  3. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Independent Research Institutes Infrastructure Support Scheme
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim
  5. Austrian Genome Research in Austria initiative
  6. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Career Development Fellowship
  7. C.J. Martin Fellowship
  8. Australian Research Council
  9. Medical Research Council [G0901737] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. MRC [G0901737] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NK cells can be grouped into distinct subsets that are localized to different organs and exhibit a different capacity to secrete cytokines and mediate cytotoxicity. Despite these hallmarks that reflect tissue-specific specialization in NK cells, little is known about the factors that control the development of these distinct subsets. The basic leucine zipper transcription factor Nfil3 (E4bp4) is essential for bone marrow-derived NK cell development, but it is not clear whether Nfil3 is equally important for all NK cell subsets or how it induces NK lineage commitment. In this article, we show that Nfil3 is required for the formation of Eomes-expressing NK cells, including conventional medullary and thymic NK cells, whereas TRAIL(+) Eomes(-) NK cells develop independently of Nfil3. Loss of Nfil3 during the development of bone marrow-derived NK cells resulted in reduced expression of Eomes and, conversely, restoration of Eomes expression in Nfil3(-/-) progenitors rescued NK cell development and maturation. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that Nfil3 drives the formation of mature NK cells by inducing Eomes expression and reveal the differential requirements of NK cell subsets for Nfil3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据