4.6 Article

Lymph Node Stromal Cells Negatively Regulate Antigen-Specific CD4+ T Cell Responses

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 193, 期 4, 页码 1636-1644

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302946

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan [19059004]
  2. Japan Science and Technology Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology program
  3. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [2379052]
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24111001, 19059004, 25293179] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lymph node (LN) stromal cells (LNSCs) form the functional structure of LNs and play an important role in lymphocyte survival and the maintenance of immune tolerance. Despite their broad spectrum of function, little is known about LNSC responses during microbial infection. In this study, we demonstrate that LNSC subsets display distinct kinetics following vaccinia virus infection. In particular, compared with the expansion of other LNSC subsets and the total LN cell population, the expansion of fibroblastic reticular cells (FRCs) was delayed and sustained by noncirculating progenitor cells. Notably, newly generated FRCs were preferentially located in perivascular areas. Viral clearance in reactive LNs preceded the onset of FRC expansion, raising the possibility that viral infection in LNs may have a negative impact on the differentiation of FRCs. We also found that MHC class II expression was upregulated in all LNSC subsets until day 10 postinfection. Genetic ablation of radioresistant stromal cell-mediated Ag presentation resulted in slower contraction of Ag-specific CD4(+) T cells. We propose that activated LNSCs acquire enhanced Ag-presentation capacity, serving as an extrinsic brake system for CD4(+) T cell responses. Disrupted function and homeostasis of LNSCs may contribute to immune deregulation in the context of chronic viral infection, autoimmunity, and graft-versus-host disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据