4.6 Article

Cholesterol Crystals Induce Complement-Dependent Inflammasome Activation and Cytokine Release

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 192, 期 6, 页码 2837-2845

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302484

关键词

-

资金

  1. Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence funding scheme [223255/F50]
  2. Central Norway Regional Health Authority
  3. Norwegian Council on Cardiovascular Disease
  4. Odd Fellow Foundation
  5. National Institutes of Health [AI-068730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammation is associated with development of atherosclerosis, and cholesterol crystals (CC) have long been recognized as a hallmark of atherosclerotic lesions. CC appear early in the atheroma development and trigger inflammation by NLRP3 inflammasome activation. In this study we hypothesized whether CC employ the complement system to activate inflammasome/caspase-1, leading to release of mature IL-1 beta, and whether complement activation regulates CC-induced cytokine production. In this study we describe that CC activated both the classical and alternative complement pathways, and C1q was found to be crucial for the activation. CC employed C5a in the release of a number of cytokines in whole blood, including IL-1 beta and TNF. CC induced minimal amounts of cytokines in C5-deficient whole blood, until reconstituted with C5. Furthermore, C5a and TNF in combination acted as a potent primer for CC-induced IL-1 beta release by increasing IL-1 beta transcripts. CC-induced complement activation resulted in upregulation of complement receptor 3 (CD11b/CD18), leading to phagocytosis of CC. Also, CC mounted a complement-dependent production of reactive oxygen species and active caspase-1. We conclude that CC employ the complement system to induce cytokines and activate the inflammasome/caspase-1 by regulating several cellular responses in human monocytes. In light of this, complement inhibition might be an interesting therapeutic approach for treatment of atherosclerosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据