4.8 Article

A physicochemical method for increasing methane production from rice straw: Extrusion combined with alkali pretreatment

期刊

APPLIED ENERGY
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 39-48

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.09.011

关键词

Extrusion combined with alkali pretreatment; Lignocellulosic biomass; Rice straw; Physicochemical pretreatment; Methane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20976139, 21246001, 51138009]
  2. National Key Technologies R&D Program of China [2012BAJ25B02]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse Foundation [PCRRY11004]
  4. New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0391]
  5. Project of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [14XD1403700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pretreatment is a crucial processing step in the conversion of lignocellulosic biomass (LB) into methane by anaerobic digestion. A physicochemical LB pretreatment method, i.e., using an extruder to reduce the biomass size prior to sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pretreatment, was reported. The optimal condition for economic feasibility and pretreatment efficiency was an alkaline loading rate of 3.0% at 35 degrees C for 48 h. Under this condition, the methane production from the rice straw that was processed by extrusion combined with NaOH pretreatment was 54.0% higher than that of a control sample. The energy recovery (ER) efficiency improved from 38.9% to 59.9% using the combination pretreatment. The mechanisms that caused the significant improvement in the methane production and ER efficiency in the extrusion-NaOH pretreatment were investigated. The pretreatment changed the physical properties (water-holding capacity, specific porosity, specific surface area and crystallinity index), the chemical composition (lignin, benzene-ethanol extractives and hot-water extractives) and the chemical structure, which increased degradation of holocelluloses and other difficulty biodegradable compounds. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据