4.6 Article

Inflammatory Response of Mast Cells during Influenza A Virus Infection Is Mediated by Active Infection and RIG-I Signaling

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 190, 期 9, 页码 4676-4684

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202096

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [P20 RR-020185, P20 GM-103500, K22 AI-091647]
  2. Montana State University Agricultural Experimental Station
  3. M.J. Murdock Charitable Trust
  4. MRC [G0901113] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [G0901113] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Influenza A virus (IAV) is a major respiratory pathogen of both humans and animals. The lung is protected from pathogens by alveolar epithelial cells, tissue-resident alveolar macrophages, dendritic cells, and mast cells. The role of alveolar epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and alveolar macrophages during IAV infection has been studied previously. In this study, we address the role of mast cells during IAV infection. Respiratory infection with A/WSN/33 causes significant disease and immunopathology in C57BL/6 mice but not in B6.Cg-Kit(W-sh) mice, which lack mast cells. During in vitro coculture, A/WSN/33 caused mast cells to release histamine, secrete cytokines and chemokines, and produce leukotrienes. Moreover, when mast cells were infected with IAV, the virus did not replicate within mast cells. Importantly, human H1N1, H3N2, and influenza B virus isolates also could activate mast cells in vitro. Mast cell production of cytokines and chemokines occurs in a RIG-I/MAVS-dependent mechanism; in contrast, histamine production occurred through a RIG-I/MAVS-independent mechanism. Our data highlight that, following IAV infection, the response of mast cells is controlled by multiple receptors. In conclusion, we identified a unique inflammatory cascade activated during IAV infection that could potentially be targeted to limit morbidity following IAV infection. The Journal of Immunology, 2013, 190: 4676-4684.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据